Why CEOs Should Consider Raising Capital Next Year: The Impending SEC Amendments to Reg D Accredited Investor Definition

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under the leadership of Chair Gary Gensler is rumored to be on the brink of amending the Regulation D (Reg D) and the definition of an accredited investor. These potential changes are currently seventh on the SEC's agenda, and while they are packaged as improvements, the specifics remain under wraps.

Reg D is a significant driver of the private markets in the U.S., with over a trillion dollars raised under its umbrella annually. In 2022 alone, over $22 trillion was raised under Reg D. This regulation has been instrumental for early-stage firms seeking growth capital, with many tech giants having leveraged this exemption before going public. Any alterations to Reg D could potentially disrupt this thriving market, potentially hindering economic activity and innovation.

The definition of an accredited investor, which has been static since the 1980s, defines such an investor as someone earning more than $200,000 annually ($300,000 if married) or having a net worth exceeding $1 million, excluding their primary residence. Many believe this definition is outdated as it doesn't account for an individual's education or experience. A popular suggestion is to introduce a sophistication qualification, where potential investors would take a test to prove their understanding of the risks associated with private investments.

The SEC's Small Business Forum recently issued a report suggesting multiple amendments to improve capital access. These include expanding the accredited investor definition to encompass more measures of sophistication and allowing non-accredited investors to participate in venture capital funds. The Angel Capital Association, having invested vast sums into private firms under Reg D, also advocates for an expanded definition of accredited investors.

Recent congressional hearings have highlighted the exclusionary nature of the current definition, emphasizing the need to make it easier for more individuals to become accredited investors. Feedback from members of the Association of Online Investment Platforms (AOIP) suggests that tightening the definition could stifle entrepreneurship and innovation, especially given the current volatile state of both private and public markets.

In conclusion, while the exact changes to Reg D and the accredited investor definition remain uncertain, CEOs and founders should be attentive. The potential amendments could reshape the landscape of private investments, making next year an opportune time for raising capital. By staying informed and proactive, CEOs can position their companies for success in this evolving environment.

Key Takeaways:

1. Reg D's Importance: Reg D plays a pivotal role in the U.S. private markets, with early-stage firms heavily relying on it for growth capital.

2. Redefining Accredited Investors: The current definition is viewed as outdated by many, with calls for it to be more inclusive and consider factors beyond just income and net worth.

3. Potential Impact on CEOs: With the looming changes, CEOs should consider the implications and strategize their capital-raising efforts accordingly for the coming year.

Diving Deeper: Implications of the SEC's Potential Amendments to Reg D

The SEC's potential amendments to Reg D and the accredited investor definition have garnered significant attention from various stakeholders in the financial sector. Here are some deeper insights and perspectives on the matter:

1. The Essence of Reg D: Reg D has been a cornerstone for powering innovation in America. It's not just about raising capital but also about fostering innovation and growth. Any changes to this regulation could have ripple effects across the entrepreneurial landscape.

2. Stakeholder Feedback: Several key players in the industry have voiced their concerns and opinions. For instance, Doug Ellenoff, managing partner of the law firm Ellenoff Grossman & Schole and advisor to AOIP, emphasized the potential risks of altering the exemption, especially given the current fragility of both private and public markets. He believes that any redefinition could further stifle entrepreneurship and innovation.

3. The Broader Picture: Ryan Feit, SeedInvest co-founder acquired by StartEngine, echoed similar sentiments, suggesting that a higher bar for accredited investor status could limit opportunities for investors and cast a shadow over the entrepreneurial environment. He advocates for empowering the private sector to administer exams ensuring investors are sophisticated enough to understand the risks of investing in startups and small businesses.

4. Concerns About Restricting Capital: Rebecca Kacaba, CEO and co-founder of Dealmaker, expressed concerns about any changes that might restrict capital and access to opportunity. She believes that any alterations to Reg D that decrease the accessibility of private market transactions would be counterproductive to efforts to support innovation, modernize capital markets, and build a resilient economy.

5. The Bottom Line: While the SEC's intentions to modify Reg D and the accredited investor definition are clear, the final wording of any amendments remains uncertain. The overarching sentiment is that any changes should be made with caution, keeping in mind the broader implications for the financial ecosystem.

It's evident that the potential changes to Reg D and the accredited investor definition are a topic of significant interest and debate. CEOs and founders should remain vigilant, engage with industry stakeholders, and strategize their capital-raising efforts in light of these potential regulatory shifts.

For more detailed information and perspectives on this topic, you might consider exploring the Crowdfund Insider website, a leading news and information platform covering the emerging global industry of disruptive finance, including investment crowdfunding, blockchain, online lending, and other fintech areas.